Confidence in our assessment frameworks
"The scientific work of the Ctgb and its outcomes are of excellent quality and are appreciated by risk assessors and risk managers within the EU." That is the conclusion of the international audit committee that reviewed the work of the Ctgb last spring. Of course, I am proud of the committee's conclusions and have shared that pride with our staff. Fair is fair: this is a welcome conclusion at a time when the Ctgb and its assessment frameworks are being critically examined. It is often forgotten that we make our assessments based on internationally established legal frameworks. These are the result of political decisions that emerged from public debate. I am very aware of our responsibilities as an assessment authority. Due to all the scientific studies and research results that must be provided for the assessment of substances and products, we have a great deal of relevant expertise. It remains difficult to clearly explain this. The political/societal discussion focuses on what is still missing from the frameworks. This makes sense and it's important to continue to invest in these improvements. Based on our expertise and experience, we advise policymakers on gaps in the frameworks. However, these frameworks are never finished, and therein lies a policy and political challenge: what is enough? This is a legitimate question, but let us also appreciate what the frameworks already cover.
Ingrid Becks
Secretary/Director